14 Comments
User's avatar
Martin's avatar

Have they got a single policy anybody wants? or is popular? There are pantomime villains with a more coherent plan than Starmer seems to have. Really hope he doesn't go the distance. I need to watch your CS Lewis videos now.

Whitley Based's avatar

There's not a single thing they've done that isn't awful, is there?

Andrew Pink's avatar

Not only do they have no moral compass as highlighted by their puberty blocker experiments on children, but they don`t possess any debating skills to justify their disgusting policies. The dismissive one word or one line answer to an important issue is their best effort.

The Sideways Thinker's avatar

In this new world order where politicians rule over us, what need is there to debate?

Unacceptable Fringe Minority's avatar

Whatever happened to following the science ? Or was that just a marketing slogan 🧐

Whitley Based's avatar

Thanks Nick, you've got some really good insights here.

I saw an article recently which identified that illegal immigrants are seen by unhinged leftist women as replacement children, to be coddled, indulged, and protected. They also view all immigrants, black and trans people etc in the same way, as sanctified minorities, but in the USA at the moment it's the illegals who are the epitome of this phenomenon.

This is the same way that Labour sees its favoured client groups. In the liberal mindset, first and foremost they must always be defended, at all costs. People often comment that Labour gives patronage to them because they need their votes, and there absolutely is a transactional element there, but it's more than that. They have a misty-eyed love for those they see as the saintly oppressed. And we need to grasp this in order to understand how technocrats end up defending first cousin marriage.

Jimmy Snooks's avatar

I knew a woman who had been to SOAS (say no more) and I noticed that every time she spoke to black or minority women who were in a catering rôle, the pitch of her voice would go up a semitone or so, like she was talking to a child.

Whitley Based's avatar

Knowing SOAS as I do, that doesn't surprise me at all. I know quite a few people who are much the same at the university where I work. The library is an absolute hive of them, for some reason. They never stop putting on displays of woke books for every occasion in the 'diversity calendar'.

One of the very worst woke/Marxist academics at our place is a graduate of SOAS. It's a lunatic factory.

Fiona walker's avatar

It’s a tribal custom from the god forsaken hill villages from whence our enrichers originate, in order to keep wealth in the family and control women. Who can a woman turn to if her husband beats her, when her mum is the sister of her husband’s dad? If only we had sourced our enrichment from a more enlightened area. Needs banning, of course.

All Mouth And Trousers's avatar

We had several hundred years where cousin marriage (1st and 2nd) were banned by the church. Then along came Henry VIII, the medieval Tony Blair.

Fiona walker's avatar

It eventually resulted in haemophilia in the Russian Czars. An interesting aside: all those folk tales where the mysterious newcomer has to undertake various quests to win the hand of the princess are about the importance of introducing new genetic material.

Matthew Hewitt's avatar

A casual aside, but when did we reach the stage where individuals with pink hair are sitting in the upper house? I honestly despair: they can't even be bothered to dress properly, either.

Pauline Bourqui's avatar

I’m looking forward to this, I’ve felt grave concern about it for some time (along with much else!!!)

James Bowley's avatar

My week can now commence...